"MEN HAVE ISSUES, ERGO FEMINISM IS INVALID"
Kinda not what us masculists (she tags this post “what about teh menz”, feminism, masculism, privilege denial” — the masculism part is where I derive that it is this of which she speaks) say, but you can have that. We, rather say that a movement that propounds equality should not focus on the issues that face only one half of the sexual spectrum. Not very equal, is it?
So there’s masculism. For the other, equally valid half of the spectrum. Not to invalidate you, rather to validate us. Get it now?
'Course, I'm neither, I'm a nonbiased gender egalitarian. Validates both, without invalidating either. See, equality.